KBR Wild Horse and Burro News

Bills disguised as
wild horse protections

  Senator Harry Reid &
Allies Attempt to
Expand Wild Horse
Sale Authority

Part Six
Adopters visit with wranglers and their horses
at a BLM adoption at Palomino Valley Center, NV
"Sorry, Senator. You can't have it both ways. If the horses are staving to death they can't reproduce at a rate to take over the range. Older horses aren't unadoptable. BLM can run an adoption program. None of your sound bites passes muster." Willis Lamm, LRTC Wild Horse Mentors

One of the frustrations common to people who work long term with wild horses and on wild horse issues is the ease by which some politicians, particularly Harry Reid, will rail upon BLM in order to get cheap sound bites. Reid and others claim that BLM is holding thousands of unadoptable horses, that BLM isn't capable of running an adoption program and that their latest laws are necessary to either protect the thousands of starving wild horses, or control the thousands of wild horses that are so rapidly reproducing that they are taking over the range, depending upon the audience to which they are speaking.

In fact some of the more cumbersome elements that complicate BLM's adoption program involve requirements within laws created by Congress. Furthermore, what would motivate BLM personnel to get creative and try to produce better results when no matter what they do certain politicians will use the agency as a convenient whipping boy in order to drum up support for whatever wild horse scheme they are currently trying to advance? BLM certainly isn't perfect, however the people who work for the agency deserve credit when they do something right and criticism should be focused on specific areas that need improvement over which the agency actually has control.

Wild Horse Groups Will Support Rational Solutions

There are three fundamental areas within the greater wild horse issue; range management practices, holding facility inventory, and quality of adoptions. While not all of the various wild horse groups specifically agree on every point, a generally accepted platform is as follows.

  • Manage the ranges based on the "big four" principles;

    1. Base range management decisions on established science, not politics.

    2. Maintain current and accurate counts of all animals and livestock using the range.

    3. Objectively assess range capacity.

    4. Follow established laws when making range decisions

  • Preserve protections for animals leaving public custody;

    1. Reinstate laws applying to all animals that fall under Public Law 92-195 prohibiting the exploitation of said animals for their wildness, sale and export for slaughter, and rendering into commercial products (except as necessary for the disposal of carcasses), and reinstate appropriate penalties for violating such laws.

    2. Ensure that such laws apply to all animals that are transferred out of public custody by means of any new or expanded sale or adoption schemes.

    3. In keeping with the spirit of Public Law 92-195, preserve BLM's discretion to restrict the number of animals sold or adopted to individuals or entities when the Bureau has reason to believe that an intended recipient is not capable of properly caring for animals requested, and in instances where the intended recipient has had a history of animal neglect or abuse or has previously violated the rules of any BLM animal adoption or sale program.

    4. Any and all expanded sale or adoption programs must remain "under one roof" so that violators of one program can't simply turn to another program in order to acquire additional animals.

    5. Maintain sensible minimum adoption fees. (If anything, the $125.00 minimum fee is obsolete.) BLM already has the discretion to drop fees for older, blemished, "special needs" and otherwise less desirable animals.

    6. Require formal "rule making" guidelines for such practices as fee waivers and waivers of the four untitled animal limit. There are reasonable circumstances, such as with reputable and qualified charitable and public benefit programs, where it could be appropriate to reduce fees and/or increase the numbers of animals allowed. Agreements should be required between entities receiving discounted and larger numbers of horses and the BLM and such agreements should record the purposes for the uses of such animals, maintenance and care obligations, and other details justifying the larger transfers and discounts.

    7. Establish a national "reassignment policy" that will facilitate the reassignment of unsuccessfully adopted animals to new adopters without requiring the animals to be processed back into a BLM holding facility. (Some BLM districts allow approved volunteer groups to take custody of "rebounds," locate suitable successor adopters, and those districts charge a $25.00 paperwork fee to process the reassignment. This involvement by volunteer groups helps ensure a good permanent home for the rebounded animal and saves BLM time and money.)

  • Promote Adopter Education

    In 2000 an informal survey was taken of successful adopters who were involved with the Wild Horse Mentoring Program. Volunteers determined that each family unit that had a successful and fulfilling first adoption acquired an average of 3.6 animals over a five year period.

    This statistic represents significant brand loyalty, and the key element for the success of the adoption program appears to involve adopters being prepared to receive and successfully gentle and train their animals.

    The three most important elements for success were determined to be realistic adopter expectations, basic knowledge for dealing with that initial period until the animal could be handled, and peer support and/or a feeling of camaraderie with other wild horse adopters. Therefore adopter education should be a rational component of any adoption program's marketing campaign.

    Effective adopter education should produce increased numbers of adoptions, better quality adoptions for both the adopters and their animals, an increased base of peer support and encouragement for additional potential adopters, new self-sustaining "social groups" of adopters having common interests, and stimulus to the agricultural economies in the locations where animals are adopted and maintained by private citizens.

    Instead of designing "fire sales" that are likely to benefit only a few individuals and, in some cases, foreign corporations, politicians seriously interested in making the most of BLM's Adopt-a-Wild Horse or Burro Program should consider the following strategies.

    1. Promote programs that provide relevant and practical information for new adopters.

    2. Promote programs that provide adopters with safe "hands on" skills development.

    3. Promote programs that facilitate proactive intervention and problem solving in instances where novice adopters find themselves "stuck" in the process of gentling and training their animals.

    4. Promote programs that involve social interaction among wild horse adopters and make it fun to have wild horses.

    In other words - Create things that make adoptions more successful for adopters and their animals. Positive results will consequently follow.

    Some of these strategies will require capital investment. Most BLM facilities are not currently designed to facilitate significant adopter education programs. The National Wild Horse and Burro Interpretive Center has yet to be funded. However it is these kinds of activities that will produce long term results in producing better prepared adopters and improvements in both the quantity and quality of adoptions. Considering that public lands ranching costs the taxpayers approximately a half billion dollars a year, a few million spent to enhance the adoption program and support local agricultural economies is not an unreasonable expenditure.

    Senator Reid has described Nevada as having the majority of the wild horse "problem." Perhaps the Senator is the problem.

    Nevada's wild horses are a resource treasured by countless citizens. The "wild horse" quarter design drew the greatest support from several very artistic choices. In a recent on-line poll conducted by the Nevada Appeal over 83% of respondents rejected Senator Reid's proposed bill. Perhaps the Senator needs to come out of isolated Searchlight once in a while and see what the majority of Nevadans think about his wild horse policy.

    Nevada's wild horses are a valuable resource. They are part of what makes Nevada what it is. They attract tourists. Established science suggests that they have little negative impact on the range, particularly when compared with the impact of public lands ranching. Their numbers are managed. Adopted horses contribute to Nevada's changing agricultural economy. It is time for Senator Reid and his compadres to wake up and smell the horses, and if compelled to produce some wild horse legislation, then write a sensible law that truly does protect wild horses and that which all parties of interest can respect.

    Return to Part Five

    Return to the Beginning

    View the Carson City Protest & Press Conference Album

    Return to KBR Wild Horse and Burro News

    Return to KBR World of Wild Horses & Burros

    Go to other Wild Horse Links

    Go To KBR Horse Net